<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhoto vs. Windows Live Photo Gallery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theosquest.com/2009/07/24/iphoto-vs-windows-live-photo-gallery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theosquest.com/2009/07/24/iphoto-vs-windows-live-photo-gallery/</link>
	<description>A Frustrating Journey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayank</title>
		<link>http://www.theosquest.com/2009/07/24/iphoto-vs-windows-live-photo-gallery/#comment-17033</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 15:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theosquest.com/2009/07/24/iphoto-vs-windows-live-photo-gallery/#comment-17033</guid>
		<description>The above article says that WLPG integrates only with online WLPG. Actually, the latest version integrates with Flickr,Facebook,Windows Live Groups and Skydrive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above article says that WLPG integrates only with online WLPG. Actually, the latest version integrates with Flickr,Facebook,Windows Live Groups and Skydrive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.theosquest.com/2009/07/24/iphoto-vs-windows-live-photo-gallery/#comment-14486</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theosquest.com/2009/07/24/iphoto-vs-windows-live-photo-gallery/#comment-14486</guid>
		<description>Hi Ray, you mention here: 
 
&lt;i&gt;While WLPG allows you to keep images in separate directories and even on separate drives at the highest level the directories merge. If you tag photos the tags will be shared across galleries and when you click on a tag it will return matches across all folders. If the tag matches across folders there&#8217;s no easy way to drill down into the folders. You&#8217;ll have to search through all the images that match the tag.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; 
 
When I use WLPG, I can just click on a tag name, and then any folder name OR date tag, in order to narrow the search down. You can even Ctrl+click several months in order to just see photos matching your tag and those folders and dates. 
 
It&#039;s almost like Boolean searching, in my opinion :) 
 
edit: please disregard my previous comment; looks like  tags didn&#039;t work quite as I&#039;d like! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ray, you mention here:</p>
<p><i>While WLPG allows you to keep images in separate directories and even on separate drives at the highest level the directories merge. If you tag photos the tags will be shared across galleries and when you click on a tag it will return matches across all folders. If the tag matches across folders there&rsquo;s no easy way to drill down into the folders. You&rsquo;ll have to search through all the images that match the tag.&quot;</i></p>
<p>When I use WLPG, I can just click on a tag name, and then any folder name OR date tag, in order to narrow the search down. You can even Ctrl+click several months in order to just see photos matching your tag and those folders and dates.</p>
<p>It&#039;s almost like Boolean searching, in my opinion <img src='http://www.theosquest.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>edit: please disregard my previous comment; looks like  tags didn&#039;t work quite as I&#039;d like!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.theosquest.com/2009/07/24/iphoto-vs-windows-live-photo-gallery/#comment-14483</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theosquest.com/2009/07/24/iphoto-vs-windows-live-photo-gallery/#comment-14483</guid>
		<description>And just a quick comment about publishing to online sites: WLPG comes out of the box reading to publish to photos.live.com (25GB) and to flickr.  
 
You can add new plug-ins by visiting &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.msdn.com/pix/pages/Plug_2D00_ins.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/pix/pages/Plug_2D00_ins.asp...&lt;/a&gt;. One of the most popular is the LiveUpload to Facebook - if you&#039;ve done face tagging in your photos it will let you do a one-time association of your people tags with your Facebook friends and when you upload to Facebook they&#039;ll be auto-tagged in your Facebook album. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just a quick comment about publishing to online sites: WLPG comes out of the box reading to publish to photos.live.com (25GB) and to flickr. </p>
<p>You can add new plug-ins by visiting <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/pix/pages/Plug_2D00_ins.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/pix/pages/Plug_2D00_ins.asp&#8230;</a>. One of the most popular is the LiveUpload to Facebook &#8211; if you&#039;ve done face tagging in your photos it will let you do a one-time association of your people tags with your Facebook friends and when you upload to Facebook they&#039;ll be auto-tagged in your Facebook album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RWDub</title>
		<link>http://www.theosquest.com/2009/07/24/iphoto-vs-windows-live-photo-gallery/#comment-14480</link>
		<dc:creator>RWDub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theosquest.com/2009/07/24/iphoto-vs-windows-live-photo-gallery/#comment-14480</guid>
		<description>Another advantage for WLPG is the fact Microsoft gives 25g free online storage for your photos. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another advantage for WLPG is the fact Microsoft gives 25g free online storage for your photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Mayer</title>
		<link>http://www.theosquest.com/2009/07/24/iphoto-vs-windows-live-photo-gallery/#comment-14354</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theosquest.com/2009/07/24/iphoto-vs-windows-live-photo-gallery/#comment-14354</guid>
		<description>&quot;One big advantage WLPG has over iPhoto is that tags are added as meta-data to the image itself. This means if I tag an image in WLPG and later import it into another app (or another WLPG instance) the tags will go with it.&quot; 
 
One thing to watch with this. WLPG saves the tags as XMP which, last time I checked iPhoto doesn&#039;t import. My workflow is to work in windows for tagging and then import into iPhoto for syncing to iPhone and other places.  
 
The interesting thing is that if WLPG finds EXIF tags it will write both XMP and EXIF and you are all good for syncing with iPhoto, but if there are no tags, then it sticks to XMP . 
 
Obviously as iPhoto doesn&#039;t store the tags in the photo, tagging there is not an option when you want to sync between multiple systems (I learned that the hard way!) 
 
So in the end I use a program called iTag on Windows which saves the tags as both XMP and EXIF and all is good. I would much prefer to tag in iPhoto or WLPG but haven&#039;t found an easy cross platform solution for it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;One big advantage WLPG has over iPhoto is that tags are added as meta-data to the image itself. This means if I tag an image in WLPG and later import it into another app (or another WLPG instance) the tags will go with it.&quot;</p>
<p>One thing to watch with this. WLPG saves the tags as XMP which, last time I checked iPhoto doesn&#039;t import. My workflow is to work in windows for tagging and then import into iPhoto for syncing to iPhone and other places. </p>
<p>The interesting thing is that if WLPG finds EXIF tags it will write both XMP and EXIF and you are all good for syncing with iPhoto, but if there are no tags, then it sticks to XMP .</p>
<p>Obviously as iPhoto doesn&#039;t store the tags in the photo, tagging there is not an option when you want to sync between multiple systems (I learned that the hard way!)</p>
<p>So in the end I use a program called iTag on Windows which saves the tags as both XMP and EXIF and all is good. I would much prefer to tag in iPhoto or WLPG but haven&#039;t found an easy cross platform solution for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

